The tsunami of change that struck the Western world in the 20th century permanently altered the cultural landscape. The emerging church addresses this postmodern context. Most Baptists will have to jettison some modernist baggage—but not their core Baptist identity—to stay afloat in the new era.

The emerging church relates heavily to postmoderns, those for whom reality “ain’t what it used to be.” Such a church may (a) consist primarily of postmoderns, (b) include postmoderns in a mix of age groups or (c) be non-postmodern but minister to postmoderns.

Postmoderns are a bridge generation between the receding modernist view and its emerging replacement. Moderns accept reality as a set of interconnected truths that, if logically arranged, reveal a single picture of reality. For moderns, reality is like a jigsaw puzzle. Each piece has a fixed place in the single image on the puzzle’s box top. By the end of the 20th century, many found any single “box top” explanation unconvincing: Science both threatened and enhanced life; capitalism and Marxism failed to end poverty or satisfy human need; and world religions proclaimed peace but stoked violent divisions.

Postmoderns have abandoned big-picture reality. Either it does not exist, or it cannot be proven by a logical system of propositions—known as a “meta-narrative.” Postmoderns’ reality is more like a set of children’s building blocks than a jigsaw puzzle. The blocks have meaning according to their context in a particular construct. Truth is established through local relationship more than rational, universal application.

Emerging church leader Brian McLaren said, “If you have a new world, you need a new church.” A conversation in the 1990s among young Protestant evangelicals about the church in a postmodern world developed into a movement that birthed a few institutions, most prominently the Emergent Village. The emerging, or emergent, church movement is so varied it defies definition. It is everywhere Christians intentionally engage the future church on postmodern terms.

The movement, like the original Baptist movement, is a marginalized, prophetic attempt to form communities true to the New Testament amidst radical change. Both movements have resisted generalizations by virtue of bewildering diversity of theologies, worship styles, regional expressions and social strategies. But shared values point to their compatibility.

The emerging church movement’s core concern is ecclesiology. It sees modern pyramidal denominations as structures of an outmoded meta-narrative age, much as original Baptists identified the Anglican ecclesiastical hierarchy as part of an obsolete state church. (The emerging church movement, for instance, questions the Religious Right’s attempts to integrate the church into the nation-state’s hierarchy of powers; Baptists similarly rejected this sort of Christendom in the 1600s.) The emerging church advocates a local, congregational, self-determining ecclesiology as both biblical and a better fit for pluralistic postmodern culture. Baptists concur.

The emerging church movement holds the Bible as authoritative, but whereas most modern Protestants sift the texts for fixed truths to be arranged in a logical theology, the emerging church is suspicious of such doctrinal meta-narrative building. It sees more story than system in the Scriptures. Its interpreters prefer a narrative approach to reveal truths unavailable to reason alone. Personal engagement is more central than defense of “propositional-based thought patterns,” according to the postmodern New Testament translation, The Voice. A statement on the Emergent Village website says, “We don’t have a problem with faith, but with statements.” Historically, Baptists share this concern that fixed dogma limits personal encounter with God through Scripture.

For the emerging church movement, the Christian community’s purpose is to incarnate an inclusive way of life, not defend an exclusive doctrinal meta-narrative. According to the Emergent Village, “reconciled friendship trumps traditional orthodoxies” and is a global mission. Baptists similarly insist on individual spiritual freedom and universal religious liberty for all as prerequisites to formation of authentic Christian communities. Christianity is a life of freedom in community.

Some critics see the emerging church movement as a heretical compromise with a pluralistic, truth-denying culture. Baptist history might offer an alternative explanation—ecclesiology is more defined by the practices of a Spirit-led community than by assent to the statements of a modern theological meta-narrative. Conversely, the emerging church movement may provide hope for reformation to Baptists ignorant of the difference between modern truths and Truth incarnate.

Loyd Allen is professor of church history and spiritual formation at Mercer University’s McAfee School of Theology in Atlanta. His column is distributed by Associated Baptist Press.

---

Comments (3)

Subscribe to this comment's feed