Gay marriage OK in Oregon county_30804

Posted: 3/05/04

Gay marriage OK in Oregon county

WASHINGTON (ABP)--Oregon's most populous county began issuing marriage licenses to gay couples March 3, marking the latest incident of local officials following the lead of San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom in allowing the practice.

Two gay men and two lesbians wed each other at a hotel in downtown Portland.

A majority of Multnomah County commissioners reportedly decided to proceed after the county's attorney issued an opinion that such marriages would not violate state law.

image_pdfimage_print

Posted: 3/05/04

Gay marriage OK in Oregon county

WASHINGTON (ABP)–Oregon's most populous county began issuing marriage licenses to gay couples March 3, marking the latest incident of local officials following the lead of San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom in allowing the practice.

Two gay men and two lesbians wed each other at a hotel in downtown Portland.

A majority of Multnomah County commissioners reportedly decided to proceed after the county's attorney issued an opinion that such marriages would not violate state law.

Oregon is one of 13 states with no laws on its books defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

The Federal Marriage Amendment, currently making its way through both houses of Congress, would ban marriage and “the legal incidents thereof” to same-sex couples nationwide.

Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas), chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee's subcommittee on the Constitution, convened a panel March 3 to discuss the broader topic of whether recent judicial decisions made such an amendment necessary to “protect” the institution of heterosexual marriage.

In his opening statement, Cornyn said the amendment was necessary because “activist judges like those in Massachusetts, California and elsewhere” are presenting “a clear and present danger to traditional marriage laws across the nation.”

But the subcommittee's ranking minority member, Sen. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.), said that was a “gross mischaracterization of the judicial landscape.”

Referring to the constitutional amendment ratification process, he continued: “I simply fail to see how it is more democratic to have three quarters of the states decide this issue for Massachusetts than to let the people of Massachusetts–or Wisconsin, for that matter–decide this for themselves.”

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Texas Baptist churches, in the BGCT, the Southern Baptist Convention ( SBC ) and around the world.


We seek to connect God’s story and God’s people around the world. To learn more about God’s story, click here.

Send comments and feedback to Eric Black, our editor. For comments to be published, please specify “letter to the editor.” Maximum length for publication is 300 words.

More from Baptist Standard