Posted: 3/05/04
Baylor regents urge president to mend fences with faculty
By Marv Knox
Editor
WACO–Baylor University's board of regents has urged President Robert Sloan to take aggressive steps to heal the fragmented academic community.
They also have called for significant changes in the university's financial plan and the sale of a controversial jet airplane.
Baylor alumni, faculty and administrators have divided over Baylor 2012–a 10-year plan to lead the Texas Baptist school into the top tier of America's colleges and universities. They also have disagreed about Sloan's implementation of that plan.
Supporters insist Baylor, among all U.S. universities, is in prime position to integrate orthodox faith and academic excellence. They contend Baylor can excel simultaneously in classroom teaching and cutting-edge research. They predict Baylor 2012 will catapult the university to elite status. And they claim opponents resist the plan because it represents change.
Detractors counter the goals are too costly and imperil Baylor's longstanding reputation for excellent classroom instruction. They express fear 2012's changes will alter the essential character of the university and move it theologically and culturally to the right. They also assert that Sloan's implementation of the vision has been authoritarian and unfair.
While both sides boast broad backing, neither has documented the depth of support for or opposition to either Baylor 2012 or the Sloan administration. However, the presence of ad hoc alumni groups and faculty factions illustrates what close observers describe as deep divisions within the “Baylor family.”
Those divisions seemed to widen when school resumed last fall. In early September, five members of the board of regents, three former board chairmen, the Faculty Senate and the editorial board of the campus newspaper called for Sloan's removal.
But other faculty and student groups rallied in support of the president, and an alumni group ran ads supporting his administration. Regents capped a show of support by reaffirming Sloan's leadership in a 31-4 vote Sept. 12.
At that meeting, regents created three committees to study academic/relational, financial and legal issues raised by critics and called for reports at their Feb. 26-27 meeting in Waco. The university released reports from the academic/relational and financial committees after that meeting.
The regents' review committee, which examined faculty concerns, the alumni and academic issues, called for Sloan to work on healing the Baylor rift.
In a section labeled “faculty collegiality,” the report states: “The committee interviews of faculty confirmed … the existing divisions within the faculty. The committee recommends that the administration immediately initiate major efforts to build reciprocal trust, respect and confidence among faculty colleagues, administrators, regents and the university.”
Citing the negative effects of these divisions, the report adds: “We strongly recommend that the administration, led by the president, immediately initiate an aggressive program to heal the divisions at Baylor and seek to communicate more regularly with all faculty and staff members, and in a manner most conducive to building goodwill, trust and respect.”
The committee's report provides suggestions for re-establishing harmony at Baylor.
For example, faculty hiring and tenure have been contentious issues. Some critics have accused the administration of running roughshod over faculty and ignoring their well-grounded views for selecting and granting tenure to their colleagues.
Administration supporters have contended the president and provost have been well within their range of responsibilities to guide the university in this process.
The committee's report acknowledges both perspectives: “The deans, provost and president should endeavor to follow the hiring recommendations of the faculty, but always with the authority to select a different candidate based on sound and justifiable reasons, with explanation to the department.”
The regents suggest similar processes for granting tenure and appointing departmental chairs, recognizing the value of faculty recommendations while affirming the validity of administrative decisions. But the report also recommends an appeals process for faculty who are denied tenure.
Some administration critics have claimed the administration has been overbearing in applying religious requirements for faculty employment.
In particular, they have said some candidates in fields whose disciplines do not involve overt religious connections have been made to feel uncomfortable–and perhaps have even been eliminated from consideration–by questions that link their studies to doctrinal issues.
Supporters have countered that questions only were intended to assess the integration of faith and learning and were not meant to be invasive or overbearing.
As with other issues, the review committee struck a balance, affirming the process but asking that it be tempered.
“The interview process of candidates is appropriate and necessary in acquiring the highest possible caliber of academically prepared Christian faculty members for Baylor, and the interviews should be continued,” the report states.
“Every effort should be made, however, to make the candidate feel comfortable in the interview process with only appropriate questions being asked.”
The committee took a similar tone regarding the role of the Faculty Senate, which has overwhelmingly opposed Sloan's leadership.
“In accordance with Baylor policies, … the Faculty Senate's primary role is consultative,” the report notes. “But it has every right to expect that its role established by Baylor policy … be acknowledged and respected.”
The review committee addressed alumni issues only briefly but conveyed a tone similar to its focus on faculty.
“Support by all Baylor alumni is essential to the success of Baylor's mission,” the report states. “A cooperative and supportive relationship between the university administration, led by the president, and the Baylor Alumni Association is critical to the strong and unified support of Baylor by its worldwide alumni.”
In another report, the audit review committee, which studied Baylor's financial situation, called for changes in two areas that have driven a wedge within the community.
“The financial plans of Baylor University have been impacted by the severe economic conditions of the last three years,” the audit committee's report states.
The report calls for the administration to present a revised long-term financial plan at the regents' next meeting, May 14.
Critics of Baylor 2012 and the Sloan administration have claimed the escalating costs of numerous construction projects and rapidly enlarging the faculty with high-paid research professors is too expensive.
They also have said it has forced tuition to rise too rapidly, changing the demographics of the student body and changing the essential nature of the university.
Supporters have said indebtedness remains below 5 percent of Baylor's annual budget and well within acceptable limits. They also have pointed to increases in financial aid and insisted the demographics of the student body do not have to change.
The committee's report calls for the regents to consider extending the deadline for achieving Baylor 2012's goals by three years. It also would allow regents to reassess the university's capital expenditure and borrowing plans.
“The board is aware that with this direction the achievement of some parts of (Baylor) 2012 will be delayed beyond 2012,” the report says. “This delay will provide time to overcome present economic circumstances.”
While affirming support for Baylor 2012, the report adds, “The mission of Baylor University can be best served by an extension of time to allow recovery from the economic conditions of the last few years.”
In another cost-saving move, the report directed the administration to sell “the jet aircraft currently owned by the university.”
Purchase of the $2.3 million jet created controversy. Critics said the university did not need such an expensive airplane and contended Sloan acted outside board guidelines in its purchase. Supporters said it is a good investment and contended appropriate procedures were followed.
After the board meeting, Chairman Drayton McLane and Sloan gave the regents high marks for their work.
“Prudent financial management mandates that we adjust our plans as appropriate to take into account economic factors affecting not only the business world but all of higher education as well,” McLane said. “This is a hallmark of well-managed organizations. I am pleased with how this process is being managed.
“The board is looking forward to continued pursuit of the aspirations outlined in Baylor 2012 under the capable leadership of this administration. We are making necessary adjustments to a plan that will keep Baylor moving forward.”
Affirming the regents' actions, McLane noted, “I was gratified to get a unanimous motion reflecting a desire by the board of regents that we encourage the entire Baylor family to put aside our differences of opinion, adopt a spirit of forgiveness and love for each other, join hands and move forward in our pursuit of educating young men and women within a Christian environment.”
Sloan expressed gratitude for the work of the committees and pledged to follow up.
“I've listened carefully to the recommendations they have produced and look forward to implementing these recommendations in the continuing effort to realize all the promise of Baylor 2012,” he said.
Joe Cox, president of Baylor's Faculty Senate, voiced appreciation for the regents' review committee.
“I was most impressed by how hard the regents' committee worked,” said Cox, a professor of management in the Hankamer School of Business.
“They came repeatedly to campus and spent days here listening to the faculty.
“I appreciate the untold hours the regents put into trying to get a better feel for what's going on here at Baylor. … It's good for the regents and faculty to speak to each other, to come together.”
Cox noted he had not received a copy of the regents' report, but he added, “From what I've seen … in the paper, it's indicative of the issue.”
While that's a good sign, it doesn't mean the situation is settled, he said.
“I'm not sure any of the issues have been resolved or changed,” he said. “We're still in the process of getting that going. I'm not sure what the future holds right now. It's still a difficult time. …
“Maybe we're in the process of unfreezing our positions, and there could be a coming together in the future. I don't see anything of that yet.”
Susie Jaynes, president of the Baylor Alumni Association, expressed hope for the future.
“I am in total agreement as to how important it is that we heal the rift that occurred in the past,” she said. “We are moving in the right direction. We are not there yet, but we definitely are making progress.”
Jaynes praised the regents' review committee for meeting with Alumni Association representatives twice and for listening to alumni concerns.
She noted the university has taken some “positive steps” toward the Alumni Association, such as taking the word “alumni” out of the name of the university's alumni department, moving that organization out of the Alumni Association's building and drafting a service agreement that gives the Alumni Association contracts to operate selected university events.
“I'm just hopeful we can focus on what's best for Baylor,” she said.
“There's a difference of opinion there, but that happens any time there's a large group. Otherwise, you've just got robots.”
News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Texas Baptist churches, in the BGCT, the Southern Baptist Convention ( SBC ) and around the world.