Theologians debate if the Trinity teaches lessons about gender roles

Posted: 2/02/07

Theologians debate if the Trinity
teaches lessons about gender roles

By Adelle M. Banks

Religion News Service

WASHINGTON (RNS)—For centuries, theologians have debated the Holy Trinity. For decades, evangelical Christians have argued over proper roles for men and women. Now, the two fights are merging into one.

Some scholars, drawing support from their interpretations of the Bible, link a belief that women should be submissive to men with a belief that Jesus is eternally subordinate to God the Father.

Proponents call it crystal-clear “scriptural revelation.” Critics call it “bad theology” and “extremely disturbing.”

The relatively private and esoteric theological discussion went public at a recent meeting of the Evangelical Theological Society. In a gathering where papers typically are politely delivered and received, a session on “The Trinity and Gender” prompted outright debate.

“There is a relationship of authority and submission in the very Godhead on the basis of which the other authority-submission relationships of Christ and man, and man and woman, depend,” argued Bruce Ware, professor of Christian theology at Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, in his paper titled “Equal in Essence, Distinct in Roles.”

Ware cited the Bible’s use of father-son terminology as demonstrating an “eternal relationship” rather than an “ad hoc arrangement.”

“We have scriptural revelation that clearly says that the Son came down out of heaven to do the will of his Father,” he wrote.

Kevin Giles, an Australian who wrote a 2006 book disputing the idea of Jesus’ eternal subordination to God, countered Ware’s views with his paper on “The Father and the Son: Divided or Undivided Power and Authority.’”

“The Father and the Son do not relate to one another in exactly the same way as a man and a woman might do, and to suggest so is bad theology,” he wrote.

The suggestion that Jesus is eternally subordinate in authority denies he has the same power and essence as God and the Holy Spirit, Giles insisted.

Beyond the scholarly meeting, the debate continues between two groups that have differed on gender matters. The Council on Biblical Manhood and Womanhood, for one, believes men have the leadership roles in the church and the home. On the other side, the group Christians for Biblical Equality promotes “gift-based,” rather than gender-based, ministry that supports women serving at various levels in the church and in the home.

Mimi Haddad is president of the equality group and the leader of the Gender and Evangelicals Study Group within the Evangelical Theological Society that brought the scholars together for discussion at the society’s meeting.

“The reformulation of the Trinity by gender hierarchalists is utterly astounding and clearly (unorthodox) theologically,” she said. “We find it extremely disturbing.”

Wayne Grudem, a founder of the opposing council and a Phoenix Seminary professor, says the ongoing discussion pits what often are called complementarians—those supporting different roles for men and women—against egalitarians—those af-firming equal roles.

“The fundamental bedrock … principle of egalitarianism is: ‘You can’t be both equal and different. You can’t be equal in value and different in roles,’” he said. “That’s their deep-seated conviction, and I’m saying: ‘Yes, you can. The Trinity proves it.’”

One of the Bible verses that comes up in the debate is 1 Corinthians 11:3, which reads (in the New King James Version): “But I want you to know that the head of every man is Christ, the head of woman is man, and the head of Christ is God.”

Giles calls the argument that God the Father is eternally authoritative over God the Son “unconvincing.” But Ware, from Southern Seminary, believes the verse demonstrates a “relationship between the Father and the Son that reflects an eternal verity.” They also disagree on what the verse says about gender roles; Giles says it does not represent a hierarchical order and Ware says it does.

Giles argues that proponents of Jesus’ eternal subordination to God the Father are guilty of “Arian heresy,” a fourth century teaching that denied the full divinity of Christ. He believes that viewpoint contradicts the Evangelical Theological Society’s doctrinal statement, which says the members of the Trinity are “one in essence, equal in power and glory.”

And where does this leave the third member of the Trinity—the Holy Spirit—who arrived on the scene after the resurrected Jesus ascended to heaven?

“The Holy Spirit is equally God, but he submits to both the Father and the Son,” Grudem said.

Hadded disagrees, calling Grudem’s stand “one of the most heterodox statements I’ve ever heard. … Members of the Trinity are coequal in power, authority, majesty and dominion.”

Francis Beckwith, president of the Evangelical Theological Society, said there is a “pretty vigorous debate” over the issue, but he doesn’t think it threatens anyone’s membership within the academic organization.

“All that ETS members are committed to is the doctrine of the Trinity,” said Beckwith, an associate professor of church-state studies at Baylor University. “Within the membership, there are different ways in which people understand that.”


News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Tulsa churches promise to pray around the clock all year long for their city, state

Posted: 2/02/07

Tulsa churches promise to pray around
the clock all year long for their city, state

By Bill Sherman

Religion News Service

TULSA, Okla. (RNS)—As Oklahoma enters its centennial year, two dozen Tulsa-area churches have joined together to pray for the state and the city around the clock for the entire year.

Some of Tulsa’s largest churches, from several denominations, are participating in the 24-7 prayer cycle.

Mark McAdow, pastor of prayer and evangelism at Asbury United Methodist Church, said the goal is to “saturate Tulsa and the state with prayer, as a unified body of Christ.”

He called the prayer project “a rare opportunity for us to cross denominational lines and be united in prayer for the state and the city.”

The 24-7 prayer started at midnight New Year’s Eve at Believers Church. Earlier that day, a torch was lit that will be carried each week to the participating churches. Each will schedule people to pray in one-hour slots around the clock for one week.

Roger Nix, pastor of Believers Church, said enough churches have signed on to cover the first six months of 2007, and more are interested. If fewer than 52 churches participate, some will schedule more than one week of prayer.

On a recent Tuesday afternoon, staff workers at Believers Church covered the prayer slot from 2 until 3 p.m.

In a dimly lit prayer room with scribbled prayer requests glowing under black lights on a black wall, Debbie Tietsort prayed that “all the churches will come together and love you in one accord, without denominational barriers.”

After participating in the prayer time, Kathy Ruddick said she believes God has a purpose for every city.

“I think Tulsa is meant to be a healing place,” she said.

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




UMHB students put feet to their prayers in the streets of Tokyo

Posted: 2/02/07

Four Japanese students in school uniforms asked to have their picture taken with Jennifer Jendrusch as University of Mary Hardin-Baylor students went on a prayerwalk through a Tokyo subway.

UMHB students put feet to their
prayers in the streets of Tokyo

By Jennifer Sicking

University of Mary Hardin-Baylor

BELTON—A group of University of Mary Hardin-Baylor students recently put feet to their prayers in one of the world’s largest cities.

Four students journeyed to Tokyo, Japan, as part of Go Now Missions. In addition to sharing Christ through Christmas music and English practice, they also participated in prayerwalking.

“Prayerwalking would be described as spontaneous praying while walking around a city or building,” said Jennifer Jendrusch, a freshman performance studies major from Corpus Christi.

Every day, the students took a walk through the city and prayed for the lives around them.

See Related Articles:
PRAY WITHOUT CEASING: Intercession aside, do Baptists have a prayer?
Prayerwalkers appeal to God to take back community
• UMHB students put feet to their prayers in the streets of Tokyo

“This involved walking around the city of Tokyo praying for whatever God put on your heart, whether it was praying for someone that walked by you or a building,” Jendrusch said.

Students prayerwalked the city’s streets, as well as a Shinto shrine, a Buddhist shrine, around the emperor’s palace and through universities.

“Prayerwalking was huge,” said Cody Callen, a junior Christian studies major from Hearne. “It was ridiculous how faithful God was to our prayers.”

In one such instance, Callen said, they were going to visit a Shinto shrine to pray for the people and place. They were supposed to meet Journeymen missionaries at the train station, but one couldn’t attend. They also were running late. But everything turned out to be just right.

“At the shrine, we met nine college students looking for foreigners to take on tours to practice their English,” he said. “There happened to be nine of us.”

The following day, Callen and another student missionary were prayerwalking through a Japanese university campus. They ended up walking into a building and encountering a billboard with “Jesus loves you” posted on it. They found the nearby room vacant and left the building, but then they saw a Japanese man entering and returned.

“It turned out 15 Japanese met there for Bible study,” he said. “We got to go and meet them.”

That also led the student missionaries to attend a prayer meeting and Christmas party with the Japanese students. Callen and the Japanese student leader of the Bible study also went prayerwalking together through the campus.

“It was awesome,” he said.

With only 10 days in the city, it was difficult to see how effective their prayers were, Jendrusch said.

“I believe that if more teams go and continue with what we were doing, then the people of Japan can start to believe in Christ,” she said. “This was my first time ever prayerwalking, so it was definitely different for me to pray with my eyes open and also to pray for everyone that walks by you.”

While Callen said he had heard of prayerwalking before going to Japan, he hadn’t practiced it.

“I definitely saw the impact and the power of prayer,” he said.

Now, he plans to put it into practice in America.

“I want to try to do some prayer walking around my campus,” he said. “It works.”


News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Storylist for 2/05/07 issue

Storylist for week of 2/05/07

TAKE ME TO: Top Story |  Texas |  Opinion |  Baptists |  Faith & Culture |  Book Reviews |  Classifieds  |  Departments  |  Bible Study



IMB trustee investigation rejects allegations of board impropriety

Christian faith unites opposing Super Bowl coaches




PRAY WITHOUT CEASING: Intercession aside, do Baptists have a prayer?


PRAY WITHOUT CEASING: Intercession aside, do Baptists have a prayer?

Prayerwalkers appeal to God to take back community

UMHB students put feet to their prayers in the streets of Tokyo

Shoes offer relief, hope in Russia & Chechnya

After 10 years, church finally has a home of its own

Texas CP 2006 receipts up slightly

On the Move

Around the State

Texas Tidbits


Carter defends Palestine book at Jewish university

One year later, burned Alabama churches rise from ashes

Baptist Briefs


New school rises near site of Amish killings

Beatles' spiritual journey followed long & winding road

Employees of Justice, Homeland Security receive religion training

Theologians debate if the Trinity teaches lessons about gender roles

Tulsa churches promise to pray around the clock all year long for their city, state

Faith Digest


Books reviewed in this issue: Beyond Racial Gridlock: Embracing Mutual Responsibility by George Yancey, Lending Your Leadership: How Pastors are Redefining Their Role in Community Life by Nelson Granade and I Saw Him in Your Eyes by Ace Collins.


Cartoon

Classified Ads

Texas Baptist Forum

Around the State

On the Move


EDITORIAL: Confusing, illogical, irresistible prayer

DOWN HOME: How neat: Scholars defend messiness

TOGETHER: A way for Baptists to bless the world

RIGHT or WRONG? Human/civil rights

Texas Baptist Forum



BaptistWay Bible Series for February 4: What Jesus Wants For His Followers

Bible Studies for Life Series for February 4: The Word From God

Explore the Bible Series for February 4: When Life Turns Upside Down

BaptistWay Bible Series for February 11: Jesus lays down his life for his followers

Bible Studies for Life Series for February 11: True belief engenders action

Explore the Bible Series for February 11: Service is sometimes risky business


Previously Posted
Wayland's centennial history a labor of love for professor

Diverse coalition forces amendment to lobbying-reform bill

Evangelicals join scientists in fight against global warming

Accrediting agencies asked to probe seminary's dismissal of female prof

WMU suffers from mission board funding cuts

Group soliciting signatures for letter to Executive Board

Host families urgently needed to care for Indonesian burn victims

TBM chainsaw teams offer relief in northeastern Oklahoma


See complete list of articles from our 1/22/ 2007 issue here.




BaptistWay Bible Series for February 11: Jesus lays down his life for his followers

Posted: 1/31/07

BaptistWay Bible Series for February11

Jesus lays down his life for his followers

• John 19:13-30

By David Wilkinson

Broadway Baptist Church, Fort Worth

John 19 continues the description of Jesus’ trial following his betrayal and arrest (18:1-10) and informal interrogation by Annas, Caiaphas’ father-in-law (18:12-27, an account unique to John). The trial before Pontius Pilate, Roman procurator of Judea, is like a drama consisting of seven episodes, with the scenes alternating between the inside of the praetorium, where the readers eavesdrop on Pilate’s questioning of Jesus, and the outside, where Pilate deals with the Jewish authorities (19:1-16).

As we have noted throughout our study of the fourth Gospel, the evangelist writes with a theological purpose. On a historical plane, he describes the trial and crucifixion. At the same time, he also unveils what is occurring on the deeper, spiritual level. As in his life, there is in Jesus’ death a larger purpose at work.


Jesus in control

In John’s Gospel, Jesus is in complete control of all that happens, from the moment of his betrayal in the garden to his final breath on the cross. With the note of irony that pulses throughout John’s narrative, Jesus is betrayed, seized, put on trial and cruelly executed, yet nothing lies outside his control and his Father’s will.

Earlier, Jesus had announced that “the good shepherd lays down his life for his sheep” (10:11) and, further: “I lay down my life in order to take it up again. No one takes it from me, but I lay it down of my own accord” (10:17-18). Now, he stands before Pilate, who has the power to order his release or execution, and boldly declares Pilate “would have no power over me unless it had been given you from above” (19:11).

This motif continues throughout John’s depiction of the crucifixion. Because Jesus is of his own volition laying down his life, he carries his own cross, does not utter the excruciating cry of his Father’s abandonment, says “I thirst” only to fulfill the Scripture, and even in death serenely bows his head and gives up his spirit in a final act of self-giving.

With striking brevity compared to the other Gospels, there are “no taunts nor mocking, no conversations with two thieves, no darkness, no earthquakes, no indication of how long Jesus was on the cross, no emptying of tombs, and no splitting of the temple veil,” theologian Fred Craddock points out.


Jesus as king

Another key theological theme is that of kingship. In John’s narrative, the Jews serve to epitomize “the world”—all those who stand in opposition to the message and way of Jesus, as we have seen earlier. In his final, last-ditch effort to release Jesus, Pilate pressures the Jews into confessing Caesar as their king (19:12-16). Further, Pilate pronounces the verdict against Jesus about noon (19:14), the time when the Passover lambs were brought to the temple to be sacrificed, another point of poignant irony.

Pilate has the title, “King of the Jews,” posted on the cross, resisting efforts by the Jewish authorities to replace it with a statement to the effect that Jesus claimed the title. Written in the languages of the day, Hebrew, Latin and Greek, the announcement is proclaimed to the whole world. Again, the irony is unavoidable. Beyond Pilate’s sarcasm lies the universal truth of what he had written: Jesus of Nazareth is, indeed, “King of the Jews.”

But beyond this irony is a greater one. Those who had insisted that the imposter, the blasphemer, be crucified have unwittingly enthroned him. The crucifixion of Jesus is the lifting up of Jesus which, in its fuller sense, is the glorifying of the Son, Craddock reminds us.


Symbolic details

When the soldiers divvy up the spoils of Jesus’ meager possessions, John points out they were unknowingly acting in fulfillment of Scripture. He includes another intriguing detail, noting the soldiers did not want to destroy Jesus’ tunic, a long undergarment seamlessly woven from top to bottom, so they cast lots for it. The seamless tunic may have been a symbol of Jesus’ priestly office, since the high priest’s robe was woven from a single length of thread (although it was worn as an outer garment); the unity of Jesus’ followers (17:21); or God’s protection (since the tunic was not destroyed).

The explicit mention of the hyssop branch may be another Paschal allusion since hyssop was used to sprinkle the blood of the Paschal lamb on the doorposts of the Israelites (Exodus 12:22) before the exodus.

Jesus tenderly fulfills his filial duty by ensuring his death will not leave his mother desolate. He entrusts her to the beloved disciple (19:26), an act that demonstrates his care for those he leaves behind. The one who will not leave his disciples “orphaned” (14:18) will not leave his followers unprotected.


Faithful to the end

Jesus’ final words from the cross, “It is finished,” clearly mean much more than “My life is ended.” The Son obediently has completed the demands of “the hour” of death, just as he had earlier concluded his public ministry with the words in his prayer, “I glorified you on earth by finishing the work you gave me to do” (17:4). “The hour” had come, and he has been faithful to the end.

Throughout the Gospel, Jesus has emphasized that he has come to accomplish (Greek, telein) the Father’s work (4:34: 5:36; 17:4). Now he cries, “It is finished” or “accomplished” (tetelestai—completed, finished, fulfilled, perfected).

In a final act of obedience, Jesus bows his head and “hands over” (paradidonai) his spirit. It is the same word used for Judas’ betrayal of Jesus (6:64, 71; 12:4; 13:2, 11, 21; 18:2, 5; 21:20), for the Jewish leaders handing Jesus over to Pilate (18:30, 35, 36; 19:11) and for Pilate handing Jesus over to be executed (19:16). It is Jesus, not his executioners, who is in control as he hands over his spirit to the Father.


Discussion questions

• Within the theology of the fourth Gospel, the Jewish leaders become so compromised they effectively reject God as their king and condemn the true Paschal lamb. It is easy for us to identify “the Jews” in John’s Gospel as “them” rather than “us.” In what ways do we who call Jesus “Lord” compromise and undermine our professed loyalty? With whom or what do we supplant Jesus as king of our lives?

• In what ways does the Gospel’s depiction of Jesus’ faithfulness to the end offer hope to you?

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Explore the Bible Series for February 11: Service is sometimes risky business

Posted: 1/31/07

Explore the Bible Series for February 11

Service is sometimes risky business

• Esther 3:2,5-6; 4:5, 8-16

By Howard Anderson

Diversified Spiritual Associates, San Antonio

Haman was made grand vizier, and all lesser officials were required to bow to him. Mordecai was a Benjaminite, and he was loyal to God, so he refused to honor a descendant of Agag, king of Amalek, Israel’s bitter enemy.

Haman was outraged. Mordecai’s mourning in sackcloth made him ritually unclean, since it was a badge of mourning for the dead among the Persians.

When Esther learned of Mordecai’s mourning, she took steps to learn what lay behind it. Mordecai informed her of Haman’s plot and urged her to plead with the king on the Jews’ behalf. Esther volunteered to go before the king.

Every Christian should recognize that God alone is worthy of worship and ultimate loyalty. We must be open to ministry opportunities the Lord may be leading us to. We can exercise faith by choosing to follow the Lord’s leadership to serve him, even when risk may be involved.


Following God includes loyalty (Esther 3:2, 5-6)

All the officials of the king were on duty within the king’s gate. Mordecai was the chief thorn in Haman’s life by refusing to bow down. From Mordecai’s viewpoint, he could not honor one whom God had cursed (Exodus 17:14-16). Haman almost succeeded in destroying the Jews of the world, and it was Esther who saved them from their destruction (Esther 4:6-6:14).

Mordecai reportedly told the king’s servants he was a Jew (Esther 3:4). It is not known whether the bowing was required as an act of worship to the king’s man or just as an overt sign of deep respect. As a Jew, Mordecai may not have been able to bring himself to show this sign of respect to one who was an ancestral enemy.

Mordecai’s daily refusal to bow down to Haman filled the official with such rage that he sought to kill all Jewish people in the Persian Empire. Haman’s Amalekite ancestry would account for his deep hatred.


Following God includes understanding (Esther 4:5, 8-9)

Hatach was a trusted eunuch who knew of Esther’s Jewish background. Many events took place in the plaza of a city, including gatherings, proclamations and public lamentation.

Mordecai recognized the decree as a threat to the existence of his people, so he boldly commanded Esther to intercede for her people before the king, knowing this would be at the risk of her life. If she was not identified as a Hebrew woman, she might possibly escape the fate of her people—but only if her association with Mordecai (Esther 2:7, 15) was not remembered by their enemies. In any event, she would be in a most risky position.

“Make supplication” means to ask for a gracious response. It is a term often used in coming to the Lord for deliverance; and here it is used of coming to a king for mercy.


Following God may include risk (Esther 4:10-16)

Esther understood that Mordecai was asking her to risk her life. She understandably was fearful. Her fear was compounded by the fact that the king had not summoned her for 30 days, implying she had not been enjoying the king’s favor recently. Who knew if he still would have regard for her at all?

Mordecai, by his confidence that “enlargement and deliverance” would come from “another place,” was strongly asserting a healthy faith in God’s sovereign power to preserve the Jewish people. He may have remembered the Lord’s promise to Abraham (Genesis 12:3; 17:1-8). God would intervene with or without Esther. If she refused to help, she would perish, along with her “father’s house.”

In the closing appeal, Mordecai suggested a providential reason for her becoming queen at this precise time in history; that is, Esther was acting as God’s agent in delivering the Jewish people.

Esther agreed to intervene with the king on behalf of her people. The fasting “for three days” implies a period of earnestly seeking God in prayer at this critical juncture. Esther was looking for the support of the Jewish community by asking them to join in this fast. Esther’s heroic willingness to die for the sake of her fellow Jews is commendable.


Discussion questions

• How has loyalty played a part in your obedience before God?

• If God loves us, why does he sometimes ask us to do things that put us at risk?

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




CYBER COLUMN by Brett Younger: Jesus’ Church

Posted: 1/29/06

CYBER COLUMN:
Jesus’ Church

By Brett Younger

In Fort Worth, Grace Country Cowboy Church began four years ago. Or as they put it, “a posse was formed.” They’re trying to reach out to cowboys and cowgirls who wouldn’t attend the average church. The church welcomes anyone who enjoys old-time country music. They promise to “boot scoot for Jesus and two-step on the devil.”

In Mayfield, Ky., boaters gather at Kentucky Lake every Sunday morning. They worship on the floating pavilion next to the marina restaurant. The pastor must be tempted to preach on fishers of men every service.

Brett Younger

In upscale Manhattan in the arts community of Chelsea, The Gallery Church is made up almost completely of single adults. Picture the cast from Friends discussing Song of Solomon.

In Union Point, Ga., a church of ATV and motocross riders meets early each Sunday. You have to assume the benediction is, “Gentlemen, start your engines.”

In Denver, Colo., a church that meets on Sunday nights is named—and I’m not making this up—The Scum of the Earth. The church is filled with punks, skaters and people with tattoos, body piercings and purple hair. I bet their choir wears black robes.

All of these churches reach people most churches don’t reach, and that’s wonderful. But you wish it wasn’t necessary, because it isn’t what Jesus had in mind.

Jesus’ Church doesn’t have separate congregations for cowboys, boaters, singles, bikers and those with hair colors that aren’t found in nature. Jesus was serious when he said God is our Father and we all belong to one family. It’s sad that God’s family seldom meets in the same church. We have churches for the rich, churches for the poor, churches for liberals, churches for conservatives, churches for white people, churches for black people, churches for straight people, churches for gay people, churches with Starbucks in the lobby, churches where the coffee only comes in one flavor and it’s called “black,” churches that function like neighborhood associations, churches that act like historical societies, and churches that say everyone is welcome and yet everyone looks the same.

Twenty years ago, I was a pastor in Paoli, Ind. Our church was a block off the kind of town square that makes you wish every town had a town square. If you’ve heard of Paoli, it’s probably because of the furniture. Since 1926, Paoli Furniture, Inc. has made gorgeous furniture that the people who make it can’t afford. My salary as pastor was $14,000 a year, but the parsonage was filled with beautiful furniture. About 1987, the Middle Adult Sunday school class—and isn’t that an attractive name for a class?—decided they didn’t want to sit on folding chairs any more. They worked out a deal with one of the managers in the factory’s chair department. The fourteen members of the class would spend $40 each to buy material for chairs that would normally cost about $500. They would make the chairs on a Saturday when the factory was closed.

What a great idea! Jesus was a carpenter. How could he not love this? The craftsmanship on the chairs would be amazing—fine wood, deep finishes, exquisite details like brass trim. Any one of these chairs would class up the Palace of Versailles.

Then I found out they were making exactly 14 chairs and asked, “Couldn’t we make a few extra?”

The answer was: “The class only has 14 members. We’re the ones who are paying for the chairs and doing the work.”

I naively asked, “Well, what about when visitors come?”

I was told, “We still have the folding chairs, and if a member isn’t there, they can use one of our chairs.”

I foolishly asked, “But won’t you feel funny sitting in these beautiful chairs while visitors sit in folding chairs?”

I was informed, “That’s not going to happen.”

They were right.

Before the new chairs arrived, the teacher put a lock on the door. We’d never had a lock on any door. He explained that they wanted the chairs to stay in the room and didn’t want the kids to get in there on Wednesday nights.

Several years later, Carol and I went back for the church’s anniversary. They still had 14 chairs in the room, and they looked great, but most went unfilled most Sundays. The majority of the class was gone. The teacher had gotten mad and gone to another church. The young adult class was getting bigger. The older adult class was doing well, but the middle adults didn’t have anybody new.

What could be less surprising? That’s what happens when we decide that the church will always be who we are now. That’s what happens when we keep the best chairs for ourselves. That’s what happens when we want some people to stay out of our church.

If my church is going to look like Jesus’ Church, we need more poor people to show us Christ in the least of these. We need more rich people with portfolios in need of a good cause. We need people who drive SUVs and people who don’t drive anything. We need PhDs and graduates of the school of hard knocks. We need people who kneel when they pray and people who put their hands in the air. We need African-Americans and Hispanics to teach us what their lives are like. We need conservative Christians who hold tenaciously to the central truths of our faith. We need liberal Christians who force us to think in new ways. We need young people to give us a sense of liveliness. We need old people who’ll give us a sense of liveliness. We need non-Baptists to expand our understanding of faith. We need Baptists who appreciate the good gifts of our heritage. We need people who’ve sinned mightily and people who seem to have only gold stars by their name. We need cowboys, boaters, singles, bikers and hip hop artists.

If we let the Holy Spirit have its way, churches could be churches for all kinds of people. Can you imagine how wonderful it would be if the church looked like the Kingdom of God?

Brett Younger is pastor of Broadway Baptist Church in Fort Worth and the author of Who Moved My Pulpit? A Hilarious Look at Ministerial Life, available from Smyth & Helwys (800) 747-3016. You can e-mail him at byounger@broadwaybc.org.



News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Texas Baptist churches, in the BGCT, the Southern Baptist Convention ( SBC ) and around the world.




Explore the Bible Series for February 4: When Life Turns Upside Down

Posted: 1/25/07

Explore the Bible Series for February 4

When Life Turns Upside Down

• Esther 2:5-10, 16-17, 21-23

By Howard Anderson

Diversified Spiritual Associates, San Antonio

Mordecai and his family including Esther faced unavoidable changes. Esther most likely had no choice in becoming a candidate for queen, but she chose to make a positive adjustment to this new challenge and won the favor of the official in charge of the process. King Ahasuerus made Esther his queen, and she used her position to give a warning from Mordecai that enabled the king to thwart a royal assassination plot

When life turns upside down the Christian is encouraged to trust God in the midst of trials and tribulations. We can trust God completely in life’s situations by accepting unavoidable changes, by adjusting to new challenges, and by availing yourself of opportunities. When life turns upside down it is better to be with God, than to have life right side up without God.

Accept Unavoidable Changes (Est. 2:5-7)

“Mordecai” was taken to Shushan, the winter capital of Persia, but Daniel and Ezekiel remained in Babylon. The name Mordecai is related to the name of Marduk, the principal Babylonian deity. Here he is called “a certain Jew,” proving that the term is used of any Israelite from any tribe and not Judah only. “Shimel” may refer to the man from the family of Saul who cursed David (2 Sam. 16:5-13). “Kish” may be the father of Saul (1 Sam. 9:1-2). If these figures are the ones intended, they are Mordecai’s remote ancestors from the tribe of Benjamin.

Verse six is difficult to interpret, as the Hebrew text does not indicate the subject of the verb “had been carried away.” The subject could not be Mordecai. If he had been among those carried away into captivity, he would not likely have lived until the time of Ahasuerus. The subject might be Mordecai’s ancestor Kish, understood to be a different person than the father of Saul. It is also possible that the original phrasing just means that Mordecai and his family were among those descended from the captives who were taken to Babylon in the days of Nebuchadnezzar.

“Hadassah” is a Hebrew name that means “myrtle.” “Esther” was related to that of a local deity, the goddess Ishtar. Jewish people in antiquity customarily had two names when they lived in regions distant from Israel. One would be their secular name, a name understandable in their adopted culture, and the other would be their sacred name given in Hebrew. Hadassah was an orphan and her father was Mordecai’s uncle and his father’s brother. Mordecai raised his cousin Esther as his own daughter. She lived outside the palace with Mordecai and he carried on his duties in the palace.

Adjust to New Challenges (Est. 2:8-10)

Esther was brought to the king’s palace to enter the context to determine who was the most beautiful and talented virgin in all the empire. Besides the influence of God upon Hagai it could be that there was a warm friendship between him and Mordecai, as palace servants that added to Esther’s opportunities.

The phrase “obtained kindness of him” characterizes Esther’s relationships with all who knew her, including the king. She received special favor from Hagai, keeper of the women, who gave her all things for her purification, seven maidens to be her attendants, and the best place in the entire harem. Esther found favor with many.

It was part of Mordecai’s plan for Esther to keep secret her relationship to him and the fact that she is a Jewess—an important element in the plot—even though to do so she must eat unclean food and otherwise ignore the distinctive observances of the Jewish law. The time does come when Esther would identify herself and her people (Est. 7:3-5). The self-disclosure would come at the point when the danger to her person was higher.

Avail Yourself of Opportunities (Est. 2:16-17, 21-23)

Esther became the principal wife of the king four years after Vashti was divorced.

The month “Tebeth” corresponds to our December-January. The king apparently was so delighted with Esther that he “made her queen” right away. The nouns “grace and favor” together mean “abundant favor.”

The phrase “sat in the king’s gate” means that Mordecai had an official position. Shortly after Esther became queen, she gave Mordecai a position within the king’s gate where official business took place (Deut. 22:13-15). Mordecai learned of a plot by “Bigthan and Teresh” to take the king’s life. He told Queen Esther about it and she told the king. After the investigation was completed the men were executed and the report of the saving of the king’s life by Mordecai was written in the records of the kings of Persia. Mordecai not only used this information to save the king, but eventually his own people.

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Politics not behind plan to unite Baptists, Underwood insists

Posted: 1/26/07

Politics not behind plan to
unite Baptists, Underwood insists

By Robert Marus

Associated Baptist Press

MACON, Ga. (ABP)—An ambitious plan to unite Baptists in North America around the compassionate message of the gospel is not secretly a plan to get Baptists to elect Hillary Clinton as president, one of the plan’s leaders said.

Bill Underwood, a co-organizer of the effort with former President Jimmy Carter, said former President Bill Clinton’s offer to lend his star power to the upcoming Celebration of a New Baptist Covenant is not a covert political move.

“This has not been something that Bill Clinton has organized or worked towards or even been involved in,” said Underwood, president of Mercer University.

“This is really President Carter’s brainchild. I think he took the initial step on this. And President Carter … invited President Clinton to join us for our last meeting, and I’m grateful that he did.”

On Jan. 9, leaders of 40 Baptist denominations and organizations in the United States and Canada—led by Carter and “cheered,” as he put it, by President Clinton—announced a commitment to put aside social and theological differences to unite most Baptists behind an agenda of compassionate ministry. The effort will begin with the celebration, which is set for January 2008.

Since the announcement, conservatives who weren’t invited have complained the intent is more than Baptist unity.

Richard Land, head of the SBC Ethics and Religious Liberty Commission, told the Washington Post the timing was suspect.

“Purportedly they’re going to hold a convention of several thousand people in Atlanta in early 2008, hosted by two former Democratic presidents, one of whom has a wife seeking the Democratic presidential nomination. Some would see that as an overtly political activity,” he said.

Rick Scarborough, a Texas-based Southern Baptist minister who is the head of the Religious Right group Vision America, also noted the timing in an entry on the group’s website. He noted that the January 2008 celebration is “not coincidentally nine months away from the next presidential election.”

In a parenthetical aside, Scarborough rhetorically suggested Sen. Hillary Clinton might “be invited to lecture on honesty in government.”

Mercer’s Underwood noted that the Jan. 9 meeting at which Clinton appeared was the product of previous meetings Carter had conducted with representatives of the North American Baptist Fellowship. The fellowship is composed of the Baptist bodies in North America that belong to the Baptist World Alliance— including those that are conservative, moderate, predominantly black, predominantly white, American and Canadian.

The Southern Baptist Convention was not invited in its official capacity because the SBC has withdrawn from the NABF and the Alliance. But several of the January 9 participants are members of Southern Baptist churches, and Carter and Underwood said they welcome participation of Southern Baptists.

They also noted that they hope for prominent Baptists who are Republicans to lend their influence to the effort as well. Clinton and Carter are the only two living former presidents who are Baptists. Carter is a long-time deacon and Sunday school teacher at Maranatha Baptist Church in Plains, Ga., and Clinton is a longtime member of Immanuel Baptist Church in Little Rock, Ark.

Clinton’s involvement in the celebration is merely to provide a bigger platform to the effort to unite Baptists around a positive message, Underwood said.

“I think that when he described himself as a cheerleader, I think that’s a good description,” he said. “But I think beyond that you have two men who, as former presidents of the United States, have a platform that very few other people in the world have.

“I think that presidents Carter and Clinton have been very generous to share their platform with a wide array of Baptists and stand on that platform and declare the good news of Jesus Christ. And I think that’s a cause for celebration.”

Carter, for his part, told the Washington Post he is focusing on the positive aspects of the meeting. “We hope … to emphasize the common commitments that bind us together rather than to concentrate on the divisive issues that separate us,” he said.

“There’s too much of an image in the Baptist world, and among non-Christians, that the main, permeating characteristic of Christian groups is animosity toward one another and an absence of ability to cooperate in a spirit of brotherhood and sisterhood.”

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Baptists in Beirut endangered as violence escalates

Posted: 1/26/07

Baptists in Beirut endangered as violence escalates

By Robert Marus

ABP Washington Bureau

BEIRUT (ABP)—An urgent communiqué from a Lebanese Baptist leader warned that escalating violence is threatening the Beirut Baptist School.

Nabil Costa, executive director of the Lebanese Society for Educational and Social Development, sent an e-mail message Jan. 25 to friends and colleagues at Baptist institutions worldwide requesting prayer for Lebanon and for the school, which serves preschool through high-school age students. It is located near Beirut’s commercial and cultural heart.

“The security situation deteriorated sharply this afternoon in the vicinity of our Beirut Baptist School,” wrote Costa, whose organization runs the school and the nearby Arab Baptist Theological Seminary. “‘Til this very hour some of our students remain at BBS, unable to go home because of the shooting in the streets.”

The conflicts were outgrowths of a weeks-old protest that supporters of Hezbollah, a Shiite Muslim political party in Lebanon, and its allies have waged against the Sunni-led government of Prime Minister Fouad Siniora. The unrest followed a devastating bombing campaign by Israeli fighter jets and naval vessels in July and August of 2006, mainly aimed at Hezbollah-friendly areas of the country.

During the Israeli attacks, the nation was shut down and much of its infrastructure destroyed, killing hundreds. Israeli officials said the attacks were in response to a cross-border raid by Hezbollah guerillas and Hezbollah missile attacks on northern Israel.

During the Israeli bombing campaign, both Beirut Baptist School and the seminary housed hundreds of Shiite refugees from other parts of the nation. However, the schools remained relatively safe.

But Costa noted the latest conflict has led to minor conflicts all over Beirut—and is an unpleasant reminder of the war between Sunnis, Shia and Christians that ravaged Lebanon between 1975 and 1990.

“Watching today’s clashes on the television brings to mind the civil war that Lebanon labored under for almost two decades. God forbid that we be heading in that direction again,” he wrote. “Please pray that God may intervene and calm the spirits of the two main conflicting groups.”

Costa also requested prayers for Lebanon’s diverse Christian community, which is among the largest in the Middle East and encompasses Catholics and Orthodox Christians as well as multiple kinds of Protestants. During the civil war, many Christians allied themselves with one of the two Muslim factions.

“Pray that the Body of Christ in Lebanon refrains from taking sides, but maintains its focus on the Lord and seeks amidst this difficult time to bring about a spirit of reconciliation and peacemaking,” he wrote.

Costa, who also serves as the general secretary of the nation’s alliance of evangelical schools, requested guidance “as I seek to lead the decision-making process in relation to when we should open or close our schools during this delicate period of time. The lives of our students, faculty and teams are an enormous responsibility. Moreover, each decision we take stands the risk of being misinterpreted to be a political stand.”

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




BaptistWay Bible Series for February 4: What Jesus Wants For His Followers

Posted: 1/25/07

BaptistWay Bible Series for February 4

What Jesus Wants For His Followers

• John 17

David Wilkinson

Broadway Baptist Church, Fort Worth

As I read John 17, I recalled a prayer I overheard 27 years ago. I was a young journalist working for the Southern Baptist Christian Life Commission (CLC). An assignment took me to Hendersonville, NC, where I stayed in the home of Dr. and Mrs. A. C. Miller. Dr. Miller, then in his 80s, was teaching young pastors from western North Carolina at Fruitland Bible Institute. Many years earlier he had served as the first executive director of the Texas Baptist CLC and then the national CLC.

Early one morning as I stepped out of the upstairs bedroom to go for a jog, I was startled by a voice. Through the slightly open door of his study, I could hear Dr. Miller praying aloud. This venerable old saint was praying for his students. With great tenderness and love, he prayed for their safety as they commuted to school several days a week. He prayed for their families and their churches. He prayed for specific needs and challenges in their lives. He prayed that they would learn, and that he would have the wisdom to teach them what they most needed to know. And he prayed that they would remain faithful to their calling as ministers of the gospel.

An Overheard Prayer

In John 17, we are invited to overhear another teacher praying for his students. Only hours before his betrayal by a member of his inner circle and the rapid succession of events culminating in the agony of an execution on a Roman cross, Jesus prays for his disciples. It is the longest prayer placed on the lips of Jesus by the Gospel writers. It is a prayer of consecration for himself and his friends. It is a tender pastoral prayer, the prayer of the Great Shepherd for the sheep who know his voice and follow in his steps.

Philip Melanchthon, Martin Luther’s adviser and colleague, wrote of this prayer, “There is no more voice which has ever been heard, either in heaven or in earth, more exalted, more holy, more fruitful, more sublime, than the prayer offered up by the son of God Himself.”

The prayer is often called the “High Priestly Prayer” of Jesus, in part because its structure parallels a prayer offered by Aaron, the high priest, in Leviticus. It concludes Jesus’ farewell discourses in John. Jesus’ transition from addressing the disciples (and the church) to addressing his Father in prayer reflects the integrated quality of his life and ministry.

Prayer’s Structure and Focus

The prayer is commonly divided into three sections. Jesus prays for himself (17:1-5), for his disciples (17:6-19); and then for all his followers to come (17:20-26). The perspective of the writer, however, seems to be that of the post-resurrection church, and Jesus’ words, while spoken in the present, are also timeless. At one level, this is a prayer for his disciples. At another level, it is a prayer for disciples in every age. It is a prayer for the church.

Jesus prays for us. That should give us pause. As one writer notes, “It is interesting to ponder how the Christian community’s self-definition would be changed if it took as its beginning point, ‘We are a community for whom Jesus prays.’”

Significance of ‘The World’

Here (verses 6, 9, 11, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 23, 24, and 25) and elsewhere in the Gospel, the term “the world” has special meaning and significance. This is not the “world of creation”; rather, the writer uses “the world” (like Paul’s use of the word “flesh”) in the sense of “the world as it organizes itself against God.”

“The world” . . . is what is out there when people try to run their lives as though God didn’t exist, which is why there is solid and settled hatred for genuine Christianity and those who, however inadequately, attempt to stand for it.

In the language of the prologue, Jesus, as the Word that was in the beginning with God, “was in the world, and the world came into being through him; yet the world did not know him” (1:10).

Jesus asks his Father to consecrate or to sanctify his disciples “in truth” (17:17-19). To sanctify is, literally, “to make holy.” This is a deeply counter-cultural concept. Holiness in scripture is not primarily a moral category, but a way of speaking about living in the presence of God. It is about being set apart for right living.

Sent Into the World

Jesus prays for the disciples (then and now) as his “sent” people: “As you have sent me into the world, so I have sent them into the world” (17:19).

Against the background of the entire Gospel that has preceded it, this is a remarkable statement. The Father sent the son into the world to do his works. He and the Son were one in everything. At the end of his mission, the son went back to the glory of the Father. It will be the same for the disciples. They will take on the works of the son. The will be one with him in everything. And, finally, they will join him in glory, leaving yet more disciples to do the works of the son and the Father.

This sending is startling in many ways, but it is not new. The image of the God who sends is woven throughout scripture. God calls, empowers and sends out of covenant relationship. For reasons beyond our comprehension, God has chosen from the beginning to carry out God’s purpose in creation with us and through us. This collaboration and co-creation is inherent in the nature of God. It is consistent with the God who takes the initiative in salvation history, in the task of redeeming and reconciling a fallen and broken world.

Jesus prays for you and me because he has called us to be part of God’s mission in the world. That is what it means to be a Christian.


Questions for Discussion

• What does “overhearing” Jesus in prayer suggest to you about the nature and importance of prayer?

• Jesus prays for his followers’ protection from evil, their mission in the world, and unity with one another and with God and himself. Imagine Jesus offering to pray for you. Considering these three categories, what would you ask Jesus to pray for on your behalf?

News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.




Bible Studies for Life Series for February 4: The Word From God

Posted: 1/25/07

Bible Studies for Life Series for February 4

The Word From God

• John 1:1-18

By Kenneth Lyle

Logsdon School of Theology, Abilene

Several years ago, my family and I traveled from our home in southwest Virginia to Baltimore, Maryland to visit my sister, brother-in-law, and nephews. We were also excited because we had tickets to see the national touring company of Les Misérables. It was near Christmas, and so when we arrived at my sister’s house the Christmas decorations were already out and the feeling of Christmas was everywhere.

My sister, Christy, collects nativity sets from around the world. She told me a story about a recent visit from some friends, where the friends’ four year old daughter was playing with one of the less expensive nativity sets while the adults enjoyed a second cup of coffee at the dinner table. All of the sudden a yell sounded out from the living room where the child was playing, “Miss Christy, Miss Christy…I lost God!” Christy wondered what the little girl meant, and after investigating found that she had misplaced the Joseph figurine. In the logical thinking of a child, the little girl put two and two together—father of Jesus equals God, father figurine missing equals, “I lost God.”

The lessons in February bid us to remember that Christianity is Christ. Using the first six chapters of John’s Gospel, the lessons ask us to reconsider the centrality of Jesus Christ to the Christian message. The lesson for today focuses on the Prologue to John’s Gospel found in 1:1-18. The familiar stanzas of this powerful text prompted the great preacher Fred Craddock to observe that this is a passage that “resists all attempts at interpretation.” In these first eighteen verses of John, the gospel writer makes tremendous claims about the person Jesus and his relationship to God, creation, and all of humanity.

John writes his gospel to a community of Christians in need of a pastoral word of comfort. By all accounts, this group of Christians feels a growing sense of distress. They have become increasingly marginalized from their religious roots. Leaving, or being pushed out of the Synagogue, they are becoming their own distinct and separate Christian community. They are sure of what they know and what they believe, but in many ways—like the little girl with a lost figurine—they had “lost God.”

Some in that community of believers had lost God in the dark corner of routine—forgetting that God in Christ was before all, and in all, and above all. The opening verses of the Prologue offer power words that remind us that the Word was in the beginning, the Word was with God, the Word was God, and that by the Word all things were created (1:1-3). Simple, self-evident truths we sometimes set aside as we go about the routine of our lives. The doing of things—marriage, family, job, studies, even church—distracts us from the marvelous truth of God incarnate.

Some in John’s community had lost God in the dusty sideboard of personality. Two times in the text (1:6-9; 1:15) the author mentions John the Baptist and goes to great pains to remind the readers that John was not the Christ, but only a witness to the Christ. John understood his role as a witness to the light, but some in the early church held out a special role for him, perhaps even supplanting respect and reverence for Christ with a misplaced devotion to John. There is nothing wrong with spiritual mentors, leaders, teachers, or preachers, but when human personalities overshadow the person of Jesus Christ, we begin to lose God.

Some had lost God in the nooks and crannies of exclusivity—thinking that “our way is God’s way.” They, like we, needed to be reminded that God in Christ came to all and for all (1:4; 1:9; 1:11-13). Some lose God in the dark closest of sinful living—living in dark ways, rejecting the light of Christ in our lives (1:5; 1:11). Others lose God in the shadows of aloofness—a willful ignorance of God. We hold God at arms length and imagine that God is distant, and uncaring, forgetting that “the word became flesh and dwelt among us” (1:14a). On the other hand, some lose God in the deceptive glare of familiarity. We make God into a buddy, a pal, and we forget that in the word become flesh we behold “the glory of the One and Only, who came from the father, full of grace and truth” (1:14b).

Many in John’s day, and some in our day lose God under the oppressive rug of legalism. The relationship with God reduced to a set of rules and regulations and we forget that though “the law was given through Moses; grace and truth came through Jesus Christ” (1:17). The grace of God poured out through Jesus Christ, on all who believe, and by which we receive countless blessings (1:12-13; 1:16).

John concludes the Prologue by asserting that “no one has ever seen God,” (1:18), but that in Christ, the only begotten of the Father, God is made known to us. In Victor Hugo’s Les Misérables, the main character, Jean Valjean, lives life on the run always fearful of his nemesis Javert. At the end of his life, after doing good to all those around him, and even sparing the life of his enemy Javert, Valjean comes to the conclusion that “to love another person is to see the face of God.” No one has seen God, but God in Christ is revealed to us. Jesus himself said, “whatever you did for the least of these… you did for me” (Matt 25:40). God in Christ shows us how to see the face of God. God is not lost—God in Christ calls us to sight and to service everyday.

Discussion Questions:

• In what other ways do Christians “lose God”?

• How does the incarnation—the word made flesh—help us to understand and know God more clearly?

• Do human personalities sometimes still get in the way of our knowing God?


News of religion, faith, missions, Bible study and Christian ministry among Baptist churches, in Texas, the BGCT, the nation and around the world.