North Carolina moderates consider alternative giving approaches
Posted: 12/16/05
North Carolina moderates consider
alternative giving approaches
By Greg Warner
Associated Baptist Press
CHARLOTTE, N.C. (ABP)–Moderate Baptists in North Carolina are talking seriously about alternative ways to support the state's Baptist institutions, a move that could divert millions in contributions from the conservative-controlled Baptist State Convention of North Carolina.
Interested moderates and representatives from virtually all of the convention's institutions met privately Dec. 1 to discuss alternatives for the future, now that ultra-conservatives have solidified control of the convention and indicated they will install sympathetic trustees and leaders for the institutions.
No plan was announced at the meeting, hosted by St. John's Baptist Church in Charlotte, but participants said there is more momentum for action than ever before–with a major shift in funds from moderate churches expected as soon as January 2007.
Participants agreed to form a committee to explore options, but no one was ready to predict if the outcome will be a simple network of churches, an alternative budget, or–least likely–a “shadow” convention.
Some North Carolina moderates have talked about breaking away from the state Baptist convention for at least four years but have feared their beloved colleges would suffer financially. Leaders said this was the first time all the agencies participated in a conversation about alternative methods of financial support.
North Carolina Baptists support five colleges, as well as a newspaper, children's home ministry, retirement center and foundation. The colleges receive $6.1 million from the convention. But lumped with funds for the other agencies–as well as mission offerings and other sources–the Baptist State Convention of North Carolina controls about $16 million that benefits institutions and other mission causes in the state, the leaders were told Dec. 1.
The meeting's objective, according to participants, was to make sure moderate and progressive Baptists have a way to support the institutions they like–particularly colleges–without funding the state convention, which they say has excluded them and their views.
Most of the North Carolina agencies are led by moderates, or conservatives not aligned with the convention's power structure. And moderates say it was their past contributions that built the institutions. But the convention's power structure clearly is in the hands of fundamentalists, who have won a string of elections by a widening margin.
Convener Richard Kremer, pastor of St. John's Baptist, declined to name the participants or discuss the content of the Charlotte meeting. “We agreed at the beginning this would be an off-the-record meeting,” he said. “We just needed a level of honesty.”
He declined to predict the outcome of the talks, except to say, “North Carolina churches and colleges are all examining the nature of their relationships.”
More significant gatherings, with more substantive results, will follow now that churches and the agencies are walking together, he said.
The key to the new resolve, other participants said, is getting the colleges to act in unison. In other states, Baptist colleges have parted ways as fundamentalists have come to power. Some have courted the favor of conservative leaders, forging closer ties, while others–such as Furman, Mercer, Belmont, Wake Forest and Stetson–have fought for greater independence.
The five colleges still related to the North Carolina convention–Campbell University, Chowan College, Gardner-Webb Univer-sity, Mars Hill College and Wingate University–recently asked for a formal study of their relationships with the convention. Meredith College already has broken away. The study by the Council on Christian Higher Education is expected by August 2006.
Moderates are expected to wait for the outcome of the study before taking drastic steps. If the colleges are freed to elect their own trustees and still can get some convention funding for scholarships, then a continued relationship with the convention is possible, leaders say. But most moderates suggest that's not likely.
Until now, most moderates in North Carolina have been content to channel their money for institutions through the state convention, which offers four budget channels.
But attempts to eliminate those options–allowing only support for Southern Baptist-approved causes–have become a regular occurrence at the state's annual convention meeting and now are viewed by both sides as inevitable.
Ultra-conservatives, who have a goal of “cleaning up” their denominational house before the Southern Baptist Convention meets in Greensboro in June, did achieve other objectives during the Nov. 14-16 state convention–electing their candidate as president, toughening the convention's stance against churches “welcoming and affirming” of homosexuals and approving new institutional trustees despite complaints the process excluded moderates.
A search committee currently is looking for a new executive director for the convention, and fundamentalists promise to replace the retiring executive–viewed by many as sympathetic to moderates–with a clear-cut “conservative.”
Larry Hovis, coordinator of the Cooperative Baptist Fellowship of North Carolina, said moderates in North Carolina could turn to the state CBF as the alternative structure to support the institutions.
But others said the state CBF won't be enough. There are many moderate churches not ready to align with the Fellowship, otherwise they would have done so by now, one agency leader said. Although support for North Carolina Baptist institutions remains strong, most observers agree there's no energy for starting another convention–as has been done by moderates in Missouri and fundamentalists in Texas and Virginia.







