Task Force recommends shelving Great Commission Giving

  |  Source: Baptist Press

Messengers vote at a Southern Baptist Convention annual meeting. (File Photo by Matt Miller / Baptist Press)


INDIANAPOLIS (BP)—Final recommendations from the Southern Baptist Convention Great Commission Resurgence Evaluation Task Force address areas of statistical reporting to and from Southern Baptist churches.

Among other things, that means calling on state Baptist conventions and Lifeway Christian Resources to cease any references to “Great Commission Giving”—a category that allowed churches to record all gifts to Southern Baptist causes, including those outside the Cooperative Program.

The task force recommendations also call for a simplified Annual Church Profile and address calls to fulfill a financial pledge to the International Mission Board.

Furthermore, the group urges the preparation for next year’s release of audio from task force meetings held prior to the original passage of the Great Commission Resurgence plan in 2010.

The six recommendations come weeks after the final report issued May 13 by the evaluation task force that studied the impact of the seven original Great Commission Resurgence recommendations adopted by Southern Baptists 14 years ago.

Giving and reporting

The first recommendation calls for state Baptist conventions and Lifeway Christian Resources to “cease using the category of, and any language related to ‘Great Commission Giving,’” a category for reporting gifts outside the Cooperative Program made possible by the original Great Commission Resurgence plan.

The evaluation task force decided the term “was poorly defined and never fully adopted by the broader Southern Baptist family.”

The recommendation calls for the continuing use of language in Article III, No. 3 of the SBC Constitution, which describes the composition of cooperating churches as giving “through the Cooperative Program, and/or through the Convention’s Executive Committee for Convention causes, and/or to any Convention entity” as a way of reaffirming the Cooperative Program as Southern Baptists’ primary method for supporting ministries and missions.

The second recommendation calls for messengers to request state conventions and Lifeway to restructure the Annual Church Profile form so it asks churches to address only six categories and answer only two questions.

Sign up for our weekly edition and get all our headlines in your inbox on Thursdays

Those six proposed categories would ask for the church’s total membership, total number of baptisms, average worship attendance, average Sunday School or small group attendance, total undesignated receipts and total designated receipts.

The two questions address ongoing sexual abuse reporting reforms in the SBC and ask churches about the use of screening processes for staff and volunteers and whether training is available for staff and volunteers to recognize and report suspected instances of abuse.

Report on church starting, honor pledge to IMB

The third recommendation asks the North American Mission Board to “conduct an annual survey of the status of churches planted, revitalized, or otherwise assisted using CP funds 10 years out from their launch.”

The original Great Commission Resurgence fundamentally remade Southern Baptists’ missions-sending agency for North America, where cooperative agreements with many state conventions were exchanged for a focus on church planting.

Specific data requests in the recommendation include the percentage of churches still in existence 10 years from their launch and the percentage of churches still contributing through the Cooperative Program and ACP.

The 2010 Great Commission Resurgence called for a restructuring of the Cooperative Program allocation budget formula to allow for 51 percent to be sent to the International Mission Board, up from 50. That directive was fulfilled only partially.

The fourth recommendation asks messengers to strongly request the Executive Committee to meet that goal beginning with the 2026-27 budget year.

Transparency and accountability

In preparing its report, the evaluation task force petitioned for “limited and confidential access” to audio recordings of meetings by the Great Commission Resurgence Task Force that will be released on June 16, 2025. Those requests were ultimately denied.

The fifth recommendation asks messengers to request that the Council of Seminary Presidents direct the staff of the Southern Baptist Historical Library & Archives, where the recordings are stored, to “begin the process of indexing” those resources in anticipation of their release for those wanting prompt “navigable access.”

From the evaluation task force’s perspective, only two of the original Great Commission Resurgence’ seven recommendations “were ever fully implemented.” The rest appeared to receive little to no attention in the ensuing years.

The group’s sixth and final recommendation calls for the addition of a fourth point under Bylaw 26.

The recommendation is for messengers to request the Executive Committee “to consider and propose changes in the appropriate governing documents” that would “require entities, institutions, committees, or commissions of the Convention to report” on actions taken regarding messenger-approved recommendations from a special work group or task force.

In the task force’s proposed language, those reports would be required within two years of adoption by messengers and included in the Book of Reports, as well as in the entity’s report from the platform at the subsequent annual meeting.

Encouraging words

In a separate section titled “Words of Encouragement,” the evaluation task force thanked NAMB for “addressing organizational challenges” leading up to 2010, while encouraging the entity to “expand evangelistic cooperative efforts by collaborating with state convention evangelism leaders and associational mission strategists.”

Those steps should include building healthy relationships with pastors, associations and churches as well as providing “clear feedback avenues” to NAMB leadership and an “increase in transparency in the use of church planting funds.”

The Executive Committee was encouraged to focus its efforts on Cooperative Program advancement and promotion “as our best and most effective means of cooperating together through shared stewardship.” The task force noted that 2025 will mark the 100th anniversary of the Cooperative Program.

Two final encouragements were directed at the “cooperating churches of the SBC.” The first was to complete the ACP each year in order to “accurately track patterns and important trends.” The other urged churches to focus on the Great Commission as well as the importance of working together for the sake of the gospel.

Jay Adkins, pastor of First Baptist Church in Westwego, La., and current SBC first vice president, served as chair of the evaluation task force.

He was joined by Robin Foster, associational missionary for Trinity Baptist Association in Trumann, Ark.; Adam Groza, president of Gateway Seminary; Luke Holmes, pastor of Immanuel Baptist Church in Duncan, Okla.; Chris Shaffer, chief of staff and associate vice president for institutional strategy at New Orleans Baptist Theological Seminary; and Jeremy Westbrook, executive director for the State Convention of Baptists in Ohio.

In accordance with SBC polity, all six recommendations are directed to messengers attending next week’s SBC annual meeting in Indianapolis.

The Great Commission Evaluation Task Force Report is scheduled to be delivered to messengers at 6:50 p.m. during the June 11 session of the 2024 SBC annual meeting in Indianapolis.

We seek to connect God’s story and God’s people around the world. To learn more about God’s story, click here.

Send comments and feedback to Eric Black, our editor. For comments to be published, please specify “letter to the editor.” Maximum length for publication is 300 words.

More from Baptist Standard