What does the Justice Department’s SBC investigation mean?

  |  Source: Religion News Service

The Southern Baptist Convention Executive Committee building in Nashville, Tenn. (Baptist Press Photo)

image_pdfimage_print

WASHINGTON (RNS)—More than four decades after sexual abuse claims against a Catholic priest first made national headlines, spurring accusations, lawsuits, a series of newspaper investigations and billions in settlements, the U.S. Department of Justice is investigating a religious group’s handling of sexual crimes by clergy and church staff.

Bart Barber, pastor of First Baptist Church in Farmersville, speaks during the Southern Baptist Convention annual meeting at the Anaheim Convention Center in Anaheim, Calif. Barber was elected president in a runoff vote. (Photo by Justin L. Stewart/Religion News Service)

This time, the Southern Baptist Convention is under investigation, according to a statement released Aug. 12 by leaders of the nation’s largest Protestant denomination.

News of the investigation came months after the release of a report from the investigative firm Guidepost Solutions that found SBC leaders had mistreated abuse survivors and mishandled abuse claims for decades.

The SBC’s Nashville-based Executive Committee acknowledged it had received a subpoena from the Department of Justice. Leaders from Southern Baptist seminaries, missionary groups, the Executive Committee and other entities promised to cooperate fully.

Farmersville pastor Bart Barber, the SBC’s newly elected president, also signed the statement. Barber also recently appointed a task force to implement new reforms meant to address abuse.

Former FBI agent offers perspective

The question is: Why the SBC, and why now?

 “If I were still in law enforcement, I’d want to take a hard look at the report myself and see if there is anything of potential value to prosecutors in terms of bringing criminal charges against an offender, or if there is anything that law enforcement needs to do to in order to prevent a crime,” said Kathleen McChesney, a former FBI agent who served as executive director of the Office of Child Protection for the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

McChesney, now a consultant, said federal law enforcement officials often investigate sex trafficking, child porn and crimes against children on the internet. It’s less common for them to investigate sexual abuse, which is often handled by local or state officials.

In 2011 a Texas jury sentenced Warren Jeffs, leader of the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints, to life in prison for abuse after Jeffs spent years on the FBI’s most-wanted list as a fugitive.


Sign up for our weekly edition and get all our headlines in your inbox on Thursdays


The DOJ generally gets involved only when a federal crime may have occurred, often when victims are transported across state lines as part of an illegal act.

While it has been rare for the FBI or other department investigators to look into religious groups’ activities, the DOJ currently is investigating the Archdiocese of New Orleans to determine whether abusive Catholic priests took children across state lines, the Associated Press reported in June.

“The issue has always been determining what is the federal crime,” Peter G. Strasser, the former U.S. attorney in New Orleans, told AP earlier this year. Strasser “declined to bring charges in 2018 after the archdiocese published a list of 57 ‘credibly accused’ clergy.”

More proactive after Larry Nassar scandal

But the DOJ may have decided to become more proactive in the wake of the USA Gymnastics scandal involving Larry Nassar, a former team doctor, who eventually was arrested and sentenced to up to 175 years in prison for abusing more than 150 women and girls. In 2021, a Justice Department report found the FBI “mishandled allegations of sexual abuse of athletes” by Nassar.

“The report noted that according to civil court filings, about 70 women and girls were victimized by Nassar between the time when the FBI was first told of the allegations, and when Michigan officials arrested him on the basis of separate information,” The Washington Post reported last year.

McChesney said the #MeToo movement has also made investigating sexual assault and domestic violence more of a priority than in the past. Federal law enforcement is in a different place than in the early 2000s, she noted, when The Boston Globe, The Boston Phoenix and other outlets revealed the extent of sexual abuse in the Catholic Church in Massachusetts.

At the time, the FBI was focused on responding to the 9/11 terrorist attacks. And federal officials rarely were investigating crimes related to the Mann Act, which criminalized sex trafficking across state lines, said McChesney.

“Federal law enforcement was not focused on anything really but terrorism at that point,” she said. “While abuse cases weren’t ignored, they were not really on the radar until the last decade.”

‘The whole landscape has changed’

She also said the statute of limitations often made it difficult to prosecute sexual abuse or to file civil lawsuits.

“The whole landscape has changed over the past two decades,” she said, pointing to Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro’s investigation that turned up more than 300 cases of clergy sexual abuse in the state’s Catholic parishes over the past 70 years.

When federal investigators target churches or religious figures, McChesney said, other issues, such as fraud or discrimination, have normally been involved.

In 2016, the Department of Justice won religious discrimination convictions against local government officials in Colorado City, Ariz., and Hildale, Utah, who had ties to the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints. Those leaders were accused of discriminating against residents not part of the church. A year later, Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints church leader Lyle Jeffs was convicted after a federal indictment for food stamp fraud.

 McChesney said investigating church leaders for a cover-up is more challenging than investigating specific crimes.

“You have to be able to prove that there was some intent to protect an abuser,” she said. “Is there proof somewhere that they were trying to hide or protect an abuser?”


We seek to connect God’s story and God’s people around the world. To learn more about God’s story, click here.

Send comments and feedback to Eric Black, our editor. For comments to be published, please specify “letter to the editor.” Maximum length for publication is 300 words.

More from Baptist Standard