RIGHT or WRONG? Transparency

Too much church business goes on behind closed doors. How can our church balance operating on a need-to-know basis and making the truth easily accessible for any church member?

image_pdfimage_print

Too much church business goes on behind closed doors. How can our church balance operating on a need-to-know basis and making the truth easily accessible for any church member?

For reasons of polity and prudence, Baptists at their best operate on the axiom, “Tell the truth and trust the people.”

First, polity. Most Baptists follow a democratic form of church governance. Churches are autonomous, and church members determine the principles and practices by which their congregations operate. As stakeholders, church members deserve truthful information.

Second, prudence. Informed people generally make wiser choices than people who lack information. Telling the truth and trusting the people tends to reduce suspicion inherent in organizations. It also raises the level of accountability necessary for successful leaders and institutions.

It is fair and wise for Baptist churches to create regular processes that inform their members. Baptist churches, however, must be careful what information they disclose and how they reveal it. All church business is not equal. Some church business does not need to be the business of every church member—and certainly not the general public.

Much information about church members is personal. Clergy should not share information obtained in counseling sessions or, for that matter, who comes to them for counseling. Ministers should be careful to get permission from members before reporting their hospitalizations or surgeries to the congregation.

An increasing percentage of Baptist churches require volunteers who work with children or youth to undergo criminal background checks prior to serving as teachers or chaperones. The results of these investigations should be reviewed by only one or two people and should be kept under lock and key.

Employment of personnel is another area where churches should be cautious about making information public. Ministers and nonministerial staff are employees, and information about their employment, including salary, benefits and personnel reviews, should be reviewed by representative church members on behalf of the congregation. It is not necessary for everyone to know everything as long as some trusted and delegated members of the congregation know everything.

Electronic media have contributed to the prominence of the accessibility-of-information issue. The inclusion of a church member’s name on a prayer list can publicize his or her illness to the world via the Internet. Printing the pictorial church directory on a website gives away information that increases the opportunity for identity theft. What church members expected to be shared yesterday may not be wise to disclose tomorrow.


Sign up for our weekly edition and get all our headlines in your inbox on Thursdays


Michael Clingenpeel, pastor

River Road Church, Baptist

Richmond, Va.

Right or Wrong? is sponsored by the T.B. Maston Chair of Christian Ethics at Hardin-Simmons University’s Logsdon School of Theology. Send your questions about how to apply your faith to [email protected].

 

 


We seek to connect God’s story and God’s people around the world. To learn more about God’s story, click here.

Send comments and feedback to Eric Black, our editor. For comments to be published, please specify “letter to the editor.” Maximum length for publication is 300 words.

More from Baptist Standard